The Literary Loom

Weaving the Artist

  • Articles
  • Stories
  • Poetry
  • About
Powered by Condra

Archives for May 2016

Truman Capote and the Ethics of Non-fiction Writing

May 25, 2016 By Sajan K. Leave a Comment

(It was this or how to create a concise article title) 

And now, our feature presentation. Popcorn grab. Snare drums. Spotlights. 20th Century Fox—quick dim. Music--slow burn melancholy. Pause. Fade-in words—Based. on a true. Story.

Or perhaps it should be put at the end? Right before closing credits so viewers are shocked? Forced to reprocess the plot?

Disregarding the ethics, what else could be so effective? Dispelling all comforts of falsity simply because it did happen. Reflecting now upon the twists and turns history has provided us--tailored of course--many such events would be declared unbelievable aside from the fact that they did happen.

“Anything you imagine is real” – Picasso

Save

​

Truman Capote, author of Breakfast at Tiffany’s and the novel relating to this article, In Cold Blood, wrote the novel based on very real events—the 1959 murders of the Clutter family in Holcomb, Kansas.

Arriving in town shortly after the incident, Capote extensively interviewed persons involved with the case, procuring mountains of information before ultimately spending six years to complete the novel.


“Spell-binding, a masterpiece” –Life
"The best documentary account of an American crime ever written. The book chills the blood and exercises the intelligence . . . harrowing." —The New York Review of Books

​

But with success inevitably comes detraction, and acceptably so, but the criticism in this case was peculiar since it wasn’t directed towards the skill of the author or the subject matter, but the authenticity.

​

Continue Reading

Filed Under: Literary Articles

Using Coincidence – Quentin Tarantino

May 5, 2016 By Sajan K. Leave a Comment

Spoiler Alert—Pulp Fiction (1994)

Butch, after retrieving his watch, is driving back to the motel while gazing at his good fortune. While at a stop, Marcellus (the guy looking for him) just happens to be crossing the road. They both recognize each other and set into gear the next flurry of events.

Random? Very. Yet random things do happen. Viewers quickly throw away any case on plausibility simply because it was an effective and well-placed means of sparking the next page.

Writers have been using this technique for years—so often introduced in the past with phrases like, “And just like those times when life laughs upon the plans of man, our silence amidst those moments could only be explained as reply to the hand of God delivering us from…” and so on and so forth.

Many times a writer spends countless hours draining themselves for the sake of a bridge between far-fetched collisions; and many times the explanation proves to be a detriment. In Tarantino’s case, it would be spent explaining how and why Marcellus just happened to be crossing the road.

A few more examples would be the films About Time (2013) and Midnight in Paris (2012). No time is spent on elaborating exactly how Tim or Gill can travel through time, no special effects either. Both explanations rest comfortably on the assumption that the audience will accept them for the greater reward of a good story.

​

Guidelines to Coincidence

1. The observer should be given a healthy threshold of continuity for the coincidence or freak occurrence to be effective.

2. Observe the trajectory of your work and determine whether such a scenario truly fits within the story—unless of course you specialize in the absurd.

4. There are no rules to the story. Disregard the opinion of anyone who disagrees with the ideal of this notion. But, there is always a way to do things better.

Filed Under: Literary Articles

Archives

  • February 2018
  • October 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016